For laboratory research use only. Not for human or veterinary use. Educational reference information — not medical advice.
Research Database / Guides / How profiles are reviewed and updated
Note

How profiles are reviewed and updated

Our sourcing standards, editorial review process, and update cadence for the research library.

This note describes how Peptide Titans Research Database profiles are compiled, reviewed, and kept current. The database is an independent educational resource — separate from product listings — intended for qualified researchers, educators, and laboratory professionals.

What goes into a profile

Each peptide profile is assembled from structured fields rather than free-form marketing copy:

  • Identity data — systematic name, CAS, sequence, molecular formula, and public database cross-references (PubChem, UniProt where applicable).
  • Classification — research categories, mechanisms, pathways, and receptors drawn from a controlled taxonomy.
  • Evidence records — literature claims tagged with an evidence tier and study model. Where a primary source is available, it is linked to PubMed or DOI.
  • Timeline events — discovery milestones and notable publications indexed chronologically.
  • Laboratory reference — storage, handling, and solubility notes where published data exists (not dosing guidance).

Sourcing standards

  1. Primary literature preferred. Peer-reviewed, PubMed-indexed sources take precedence. Preprints may be indexed with clear labeling when no peer-reviewed equivalent exists.
  2. No anecdote or forum sources. Social media reports, patient testimonials, and marketing materials are excluded.
  3. Traceable references. Every evidence row links to an external identifier (PMID, DOI, or curated URL) so readers can verify the original paper.
  4. Neutral language. Profile text describes mechanisms and observations “under investigation” — not established clinical effects.

Review process

New and updated profiles pass through a structured review before publication:

  • Identity fields are cross-checked against PubChem and primary literature.
  • Evidence claims are classified by tier and mapped to the originating publication.
  • Language is screened for medical advice, dosing, or promotional claims.
  • Taxonomy assignments (category, mechanism, receptor) are validated against the controlled vocabulary.

Update cadence

Activity Frequency
Literature scan for flagship peptides Weekly
New peptide profile additions Ongoing, priority by citation volume
Identity / structure field audits Quarterly
Taxonomy and evidence-tier schema As needed; versioned in plugin releases

What we exclude

  • Product links, pricing, or purchase CTAs within research profiles.
  • Dosing protocols, administration routes, or “how to use” instructions.
  • Health outcome claims or comparisons to approved drugs.
  • User-generated content without peer-reviewed backing.

Corrections: If you identify a factual error in a profile — incorrect CAS, misclassified publication, broken DOI — please contact us with the profile name and source reference. Verified corrections are prioritized in the weekly review queue.

For laboratory research use only. Not for human or veterinary use. Educational reference information — not medical advice.